Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Burnquist

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 5, 1943No. 33,583PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Yoíjngbahl, Justice.

This action is brought under Minn. St. 1941, c. 555 (Mason St. 1940 Supp. §§ 9455-1 to 9455-16), on behalf of plaintiff and others similarly situated, for a declaratory judgment to determine the rights and duties of the parties under Id. § 221.02, subd. 13 (§ 5015-20, subd. [g], the second sentence of which is pertinent and is as follows:

* * The terms 'common carrier’ and 'contract carrier’ shall not apply to any person engaged in the business of operating motor vehicles in the transportation of property exclusively within the zone circumscribed by a line running parallel…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. State v. Northwest Poultry & Egg Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Portland Van & Storage Co. v. HossOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Riley v. LawsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wichelman v. MessnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. State v. BolsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. State v. EndSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Against N.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. Target Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API