Kopczynski v. Bolcom-Vanderhoof Logging Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Eng county, Main, J., entered March 9, 1912, dismissing an action on contract, upon sustaining a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
Appellant brought this action to recover damages for the alleged breach of a contract with respondent for furnishing slops and refuse from the cookhouse at its logging camp, for appellant’s use in feeding hogs. At the close of the evidence, the court below sustained a challenge to its sufficiency, and plaintiff appeals.
In order to recover, it was essential that appellant should establish the contract and its breach, arid then bring his *94proof within the proper measure of damages. The evidence relied upon to establish the contract is that the foreman of the respondent’s logging camp at Acme, in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lillard v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
- Canton, Cadiz & Hopkinsville Turnpike Co. v. McIntireCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cannon v. Oregon Moline Plow Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
- Cuschner v. Pittsburgh-Hickson Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Nelson v. DavenportWashington Supreme Court · 1919