Wolff v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants New York City Transit Authority and CAB Associates appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J), dated September 26, 2003, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
“The proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to eliminate any material issues of fact” (Winegrad v New York Univ.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- George Larkin Trucking Co. v. Lisbon Tire Mart, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Doe v. Orange-Ulster Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- DeLeon v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Engel v. JacobsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lucido v. MancusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Khamis v. CG Foods, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Nagel v. Brothers International Food, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Kencar Associates, LLC v. Town of KentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Restrepo v. Rockland Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.