Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Chilquist

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1988No. 1078PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

Appellant, Michael H. Chilquist, appeals from judgment of sentence entered following the acceptance of appellant’s guilty plea to charges of robbery and related offenses. We grant allowance of appeal of the discretionary aspects of sentence, and affirm judgment of sentence.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On January 5, 1987, appellant robbed a Hills Department Store in Bethel Park, Pennsylvania. While the robbery was still in progress, an employee outside the manager’s office where the robbery occurred noticed the robbery and called the police. The police dispatcher relayed the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. DeversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. SessomsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. DardenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. FelixSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PenrodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Com. v. Velez, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Com. v. Baker, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Com. v. Bronson, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API