Commonwealth v. Penrod
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge:
In this case we are called upon to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing appellant on his second drunk driving conviction by permitting restitution for losses caused by the post-accident criminal conduct of an unknown third party, by using his prior conviction to determine the mandatory minimum and as an aggravating factor, by considering facts not of record, and by admitting and considering allegedly inflammatory victim impact evidence. The restitution claim was not properly preserved for appeal. We grant allowance of discretionary aspects of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. PetrasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. DardenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. YanoffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. PappasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. SauersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Commonwealth v. ScullinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.