John Wesley SMITHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert TOWERY; John A. Knight; Scott McGregor, Defendants-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Nevada state prisoner John Wesley Smit-hart appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416, 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937, 110 S.Ct. 3217, 110 L.Ed.2d 664 (1990), and affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.
We are called upon to apply the rule of Heck v. Humphrey, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), to an-action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 which seeks damages for, inter aha, excessive foree applied during the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wells v. BonnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
3Cited by218 opinions
- Smith v. City of HemetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Bush v. StrainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Ballard v. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Ove v. GwinnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Cabrera v. City of Huntington ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
213 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.