Leahy v. North Carolina Board of Nursing
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Justice.
The petitioner first argues that under the “whole record” test, which must be applied in this case, there is not substantial evidence to support the findings of fact by the Board upon which it based its order revoking her license. See Thompson v. Wake County Bd. of Educ., 292 N.C. 406, 233 S.E.2d 538 (1977). The first finding of fact about which the petitioner complains is the finding that she did not adequately document the treatment of Mr. Clodfelter. Lynn Boggs testified, “Throughout the entire evening there was no documentation by Ms. Leahy although she was the RN on the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thompson v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Dailey v. North Carolina State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
3Cited by10 opinions
- Martin v. SizemoreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- Watkins v. North Carolina State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Sibley v. North Carolina Board of Therapy ExaminersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Ingram v. NC State Bd. of Plumbing, HeatingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- Ingram v. NC State Bd. of Plumbing, HeatingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.