Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Ryyth

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2001No. NonePublished

1DissentSabers, Justice

[¶ 19.] Ryyth was ordered to pay extradition costs in the amount of $1,175.00 to Pennington County. The majority opinion correctly determines that the County cannot recover these costs under the victim restitution statute. See State v. Sprecher, 2000 SD 17, 606 N.W.2d 138 (stating a county is not a proper party to recover under the victim restitution statute).

[¶ 20.] However, the majority opinion attempts to justify these extradition costs as costs of prosecution under SDCL 23A-27-26:

*294In all criminal actions, upon conviction of the defendant, the court may adjudge that the defendant pay the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Maryott v. First National Bank of EdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. CoderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. State v. GarnettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. BratcherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. State v. MaupinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API