Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Fabritis

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 18, 1937No. 2 Div. 87PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is a bill in equity which seeks to enjoin the collection of a stamp tax on playing cards under schedule 109 of the Revenue Act of 1935 (see Gen.Acts 1935, p. 441, p. 485, § 348, schedule 109), and such a tax on a punch board under schedule 113, and the penalty assessed by the state tax commission under section 15, schedule 159.

It is claimed that complainant was not subject to the tax; and that section 15, schedule 159, does not apply to schedules 109 and 113, and that if it does, complainant is deprived of due process under the Constitution (section 6) by such act.

The…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ohio Valley Water Co. v. Ben Avon BoroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Oklahoma Operating Co. v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Ex Parte ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Bachelor v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Alabama Public Service Commission v. Mobile Gas Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Newton v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. State v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. State v. OverbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. State v. SheldonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Scott v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API