Legal Opinion

Mendlovitz v. Samuels Shoe Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 28, 1928No. 7966PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCobbs, J.

Appellee sued appellant in the justice court of Guadalupe county to recover on a foreign judgment for $152.88, with 6 per cent, interest and for costs. This judgment was rendered by justice court of the fourth district in the city of St. Louis, Mo.

On appeal to the county court it was tried de novo. Appellant filed among other defenses a sworn answer that the judgment was procured by fraud or mistake, because he had never been properly served by citation or other process, nor did he waive service, appear, or answer to the suit, or authorize any other person to do so for him. The case was tried…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ormsby v. RatcliffeTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Bulin v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. Lieber v. LieberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Swearingen v. SwearingenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Harrison v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mitchim v. MitchimTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Dunagan v. BusheyTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Garman v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Hamilton v. NewburyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Roberts v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API