Spring Valley Water Works v. San Mateo Water Works
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, county of San Mateo, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are státed in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
This ease arises out of a proceeding commenced under part 3, title 7, Code of Civil Procedure, relative to the subject of eminent domain. As shaped by the pleadings, the proceeding indirectly involves a controversy between two water, corporations, each incorporated under the laws of the State, and claiming to be in charge of a public use, for which it asserts the right to appropriate private property. In the exercise of that right the plaintiff seeks, by the proceeding in hand, to comdemn twenty-eight acres of land in San Mateo County which, it alleges, form part of the cañadas, valleys, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Prather v. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- In Re N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co. v. . M.G.L. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bennett v. City of MarionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Linggi v. GarovottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Spring Valley Waterworks v. City & County of San FranciscoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1911
- Kinney v. Citizens Water & Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1909
- City of Carlsbad v. WightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.