Legal Opinion

Spring Valley Water Works v. San Mateo Water Works

California Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1883PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, county of San Mateo, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are státed in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.

This ease arises out of a proceeding commenced under part 3, title 7, Code of Civil Procedure, relative to the subject of eminent domain. As shaped by the pleadings, the proceeding indirectly involves a controversy between two water, corporations, each incorporated under the laws of the State, and claiming to be in charge of a public use, for which it asserts the right to appropriate private property. In the exercise of that right the plaintiff seeks, by the proceeding in hand, to comdemn twenty-eight acres of land in San Mateo County which, it alleges, form part of the cañadas, valleys, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Prather v. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. In Re N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co. v. . M.G.L. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bennett v. City of MarionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Linggi v. GarovottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Spring Valley Waterworks v. City & County of San FranciscoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1911
  4. Kinney v. Citizens Water & Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. City of Carlsbad v. WightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API