Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Nakahara

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1941No. Civ. 2548; Civ. 2549PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORAN, J., pro tem.

Defendants have appealed from judgments rendered against them in these two actions, consolidated for trial and now considered together on appeal as they present identical issues.

Both actions arise out of a collision between a Ford sedan driven by William Cusack and owned by F. C. Ferguson who was riding therein at the time, and a GMC truck driven by-George Nakahara and owned by Harry Nagai Produce Company. Ferguson was injured and his Ford damaged. William Cusack was killed.

Ferguson filed suit against the driver and the owner of the truck to recover damages for alleged…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Soda v. MarriottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Akers v. CowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Ketchum v. PatteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Reeves v. LapintaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Cooper v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Spear v. LeuenbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Nance v. Fresno City Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Loughan v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Muir v. Cheney Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API