Barton v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
A single justice of this court has reported the question whether the Commonwealth is barred by the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the Federal Constitution from retrying Edward R. Barton, Jr. (hereinafter the defendant), on two felony indictments after his initial trial terminated in a mistrial. We conclude that there was no “manifest necessity” for the declaration of a mistrial and, *689as a consequence, that the defendant’s reprosecution is barred.
The defendant and one Joshua Nixon were put to trial on November 18, 1980, before a fourteen person jury in the Superior Court on…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lovett v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Barton v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Couto v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984