Legal Opinion

People v. Whitmer

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1969No. Docket 5,438PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant requested of the trial court, before sentencing, to withdraw his plea of guilty to the included offense of attempted breaking and entering. * Defendant appeals from the denial of his request.

At the time of his request, the defendant stated to the court that the reason for his guilty plea was that he had been told that his younger brother would receive lenient consideration in a similar charge, which the brother did receive.

The Michigan Supreme Court said in People v. Bencheck (1960), 360 Mich 430:

“Generally, it is considered that there is no absolute right to withdrawal of a guilty…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ZaleskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. BencheckMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. BanningMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. People v. HollmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. ForrestMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. People v. IrwinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. People v. FennMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. People v. CantuMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. People v. StewartMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API