Legal Opinion

Botteicher v. Becker

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 2018No. 20170386PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jensen, Justice.

[¶ 1] Sandy Botteicher ("Botteicher") appeals from a judgment dismissing her claims against Pam and Darwin Becker (collectively "Beckers") and awarding the Beckers $5,000 for their attorney fees. Botteicher challenges the district court's determination that some of her claims were previously resolved in separate probate proceedings and were barred by res judicata, that her claim for interference with the right of burial and her claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress could be dismissed as a matter of law, and that the Beckers were entitled to an award of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Muchow v. LindbladNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. ZiebarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Williston v. SolbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Gould v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. McColl Farms, LLC v. PflaumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eric Poemoceah v. Morton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
  2. Estate of SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Markegard v. WilloughbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Estate of JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Markegard v. WilloughbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API