Woodall v. Harris
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Forfeiture of recognizance; from Pike superior court—Judge Searcy. October 12, 1917.
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, P. J.
This was a rule nisi for the forfeiture of a bond given in a criminal case. The only error assigned in the bill of exceptions is upon the judgment of the court sustaining a demurrer filed - to the answer of the sureties upon the bond. It does not appear, either from the bill of exceptions or the record, that any final judgment was ever rendered. The bill of exceptions therefore can not be maintained. Byrd v. Brown, 17 Ga. App. 422 (87 S. E. 607); Vaughn V. Milner, 121 Ga. 436 (49 S. E. 287); United Glass Go. v. McConnell, 110 Ga. 616 (36 S. E. 58); Harrell v. Tift, 70 Ga. 730; Newberry v.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lyndon v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Newberry v. TenantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Kibben v. Coastwise Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Harrell v. TiftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- United Glass Co. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kennedy & Co. v. Savannah Buggy Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Oliver v. GordyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921