Legal Opinion
Rose v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided May 31, 2017No. CR-16-1067PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Judge.
1 iLori Rose appeals the Polk County Circuit Court’s order denying her Rule 37 petition for postconviction relief. Ark, R. Crim. P. 37,1 (2016). We assumed jurisdiction of this appeal pursuant to footnote 1 in Barnes v. State, 2017 Ark. 76, 511 S.W.3d 845 (per curiam). Rose contends that the trial, court erred in denying her petition because trial counsel was ineffective .for failing to (1) file a motion to suppress; ©.introduce a text message; (3) meet with Rose to prepare for trial; (4) present witnesses on Rose’s behalf; and (5) involve Rose in the jury selection…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Sartin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- United States v. Juan M. Gordon, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
- Henry A. Harmon v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
- Slater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
- AmWins Specialty Auto, Inc. v. Eduardo Cabral, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2019