Legal Opinion

Paddock, Smith, Etc. v. Waay Television

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 17, 1982No. Civ. 2956PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action upon a contract by WAAY Television (appellee) against William Y. Aydlotte and James F. Paddock (appellants). The trial court, after an ore tenus hearing, found for the appellee. The appellants appeal to this court. For the reasons stated below we reverse.

The record reveals the following: During 1979, the appellee-WAAY, through its media representative in Atlanta, Georgia, entered into a contract with Paddock, Smith Aydlotte, an advertising agency located in Atlanta. The contract required the appellee to broadcast a series of commercials prepared by the agency on behalf of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Home Indem. Co. v. Reed Equipment Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Cohen v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Hendrix, Mohr & Yardley, Inc. v. City of DaphneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Christian & Craft Grocery Co. v. Fruitdale Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. Taylor v. GodseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harrell v. Reynolds Metals Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Co-Ex Plastics, Inc. v. AlaPak, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. In Re ChismUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 1985
  4. Cleghorn v. Ferron MetalcraftCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  5. In Re Coala, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API