Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Hemrich

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1936No. 26033. En BancPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

In October, 1934, the respondent bank commenced two separate actions predicated upon promissory notes made by John A. Hemrich. One suit was based upon notes made by Hemrich alone and the other upon a note signed by Hemrich and also by the Old Yankee Syrup Company, a corporation. Amelia Hemrich, as guarantor * of all of the notes, was made a defendant in each suit. In each complaint, it was alleged that Hemrich had pledged and delivered to the plaintiff six hundred and ninety-seven shares of the capital stock of the First National Bank of Seattle as security for the payment of the note or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. National Bank v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Thompson v. Saint Nicholas National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. National Bank of Xenia v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. United States v. Colton Marble & Lime Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Short v. Allegheny Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Hemrich v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API