Hemrich v. First National Bank
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
There are here for consideration three separate appeals which have been consolidated for hearing and determination.
June 4, 1934, Anita M. Hemrich was appointed guardian of John A. Hemrich, an incompetent person, and duly qualified as such. The respondent First National Bank of Seattle held promissory notes signed by the ward as maker sometime prior to the guardianship. One of the notes was also signed by a corporation of which he owned practically all of the stock. The bank presented its claim, based on the notes, to the guardian, which was neither allowed nor disallowed within the thirty…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bank of California v. StarrettWashington Supreme Court · 1920
- First Bank of Cordova v. TjosevigWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Cunningham v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Rose v. ShapiroWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- In Re the Guardianship of DodsonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Quesnell v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Amick v. BaughWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Quesnell v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Van Gilder v. WarfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1941