Legal Opinion
Callico v. City of Belleville
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 25, 2004No. Nos. 03-2845, 03-2846.*PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This case, beginning as a municipal zoning dispute, eventually spilled over into both state and federal court, and was ultimately consolidated into a 506-paragraph combined complaint. Several principles contributed to the case’s resolution, including the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, the statute of limitations, and the court’s ability to enforce its orders under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). We affirm.
In June 1998, an Illinois state court determined that a house owned by Edward and Lea Ann Callico was unfit for occupancy. Finding the Callicos unable or unwilling to fix it, the court authorized its…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States of America by and Through Joseph E. Garst v. Lockheed-Martin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- A.D. Brokaw v. Karen Weaver, Mercer County, State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Larry Davis v. Ruby Foods, Inc., Doing Business as Dunkin' Donuts, Inc., and Baskin-Robbins, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Reginald Wiley v. City of Chicago and Broderick Jones, 17432, Chicago Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Mills v. Harmon Law Offices, P.C.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fincher v. South Bend Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009
- Callico Et Ux. v. City of Belleville, IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2005