Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Mirzan

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 10, 1887PublishedCited by 16 opinions

ORIGINAL. This was a motion for leave to file a petition for a writ .of habeas corpus. The allegations were that the petitioner was a citizen of the United States temporarily residing in Alexandria, in Egypt, in the Ottoman Dominions, in 1880; that while there at that time he was accused of the murder of one Alexander Dahon in Alexandria; that by direction of the then Secretary of State, Horace Maynard, Esq. then Minister.of the United States at Constantinople proceeded to…

Read the full summary

ORIGINAL. This was a motion for leave to file a petition for a writ .of habeas corpus. The allegations were that the petitioner was a citizen of the United States temporarily residing in Alexandria, in Egypt, in the Ottoman Dominions, in 1880; that while there at that time he was accused of the murder of one Alexander Dahon in Alexandria; that by direction of the then Secretary of State, Horace Maynard, Esq. then Minister.of the United States at Constantinople proceeded to Alexandria- for the purpose of presiding over his trial on that accusation; that he was arraigned before Mr. Maynard on a…

1Opinion of the Court

Me: Chief Justice "Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This motion is denied. As since the act of March 3, 1885, 23 Stat. 437, an appeal lies to this court from the judgments of the Circuit Courts in habeas corpus cases, this court will not issue such a writ, even if it has the power — about which it is unnecessary now to express an opinion — in cases where it may as well be done in the proper Circuit Court, if there are no special circumstances in the case making direct action' or inter-yention by this court necessary or expedient. In this case there are no such special circumstances,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Wales v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Salinger v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Ex Parte HudgingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Riggins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. In re GreeneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1892
  5. In Re LincolnSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API