Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 8, 2005No. 258, September Term, 2004, 446, September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, C.J.

In this appeal from the Circuit Court for Cecil County, appellants Gary Eugene Earl, Jr. (Earl) and Kevin Leon Hubbard (Hubbard) present us with the question of “[w]hether appellants’ constitutional protections against double jeopardy would be violated by a retrial because the [circuit court] was unjustified in finding a manifest necessity for declaring a mistrial[?]” For the reasons that follow, we answer “no” to this question and remand for further proceedings in the circuit court.

Relevant Procedural History

Appellants and a man named Edward Wallace Benson, III, were charged with attempted…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. North v. NorthCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 3598Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hubbard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API