Legal Opinion
United States v. Kenneth A. Makekau and Yoichi Takahashi
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 9, 1970No. 24358_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant Makekau was convicted of selling heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174 and 26 U.S.C. § 4704(a). Defendant Takahashi was convicted of violating section 4704(a). We affirm both convictions.
Defendants contend that they were denied effective assistance of coun sel by a pretrial order .limiting their counsel’s access to the government informer who made the purchases in the transactions for which they were indicted. The order instructed the government to disclose the informer’s identity to the defendants but forbade both defendants and their counsel from “directly or indirectly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jesus Velarde-Villarreal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Pablo Guerra and Manuel RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Frank D'angiolillo, A/K/A Frank Buick and Louis D'AngiolilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- United States v. James CanslerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Louis Perez Cerda v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. NoahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Arthur FeraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Larry HayesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Felipe CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.