Legal Opinion

United States v. Pablo Guerra and Manuel Rivera

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 5, 1964No. 27792_1PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:

After a trial to the Court without a jury, appellants Pablo Guerra and Manuel Rivera were convicted of unlawfully selling narcotics, and of participating in a conspiracy to do so; in addition, Guerra was convicted of assaulting a narcotics agent with a deadly weapon. On appeal, no challenge is made to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the convictions, but appellants raise several arguments relating to the fairness of the trial, and the propriety of several of the Court’s rulings therein.

Since the sufficiency of the evidence is conceded, the government’s proof…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. United States v. HoffaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  2. United States Ex Rel. Elksnis v. GilliganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  3. Commonwealth v. NegriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  5. Alejandrino Diaz-Rosendo and Felix Anenson Fernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API