Hallmark v. Dalton Construction Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1DissentFontron, J.
I agree with Justices Fatzer and Kaul that the judgment of the district court should be reversed, and desire to elaborate briefly on my reasons for doing so.
First, it should be said, in all candor, that the statute involved in this lawsuit, K. S. A. 44-556 (now K. S. A. 1970 Supp.) would have difficulty in qualifying as a model for lucid legislation. Its present provisions, if literally applied, would largely cancel each other.
The statute deals with appeals. So far as the issue presently before the court is concerned, the forepart of the statute provides in essence that an appeal from the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barten v. Turkey Creek Watershed Joint District No. 32Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- State ex rel. Wheat v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Harris v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- Shumaker v. Kansas State Labor DepartmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- State v. SumnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.