Legal Opinion

Capshaw v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 29, 1914No. 3077PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON", Judge.

This conviction was for seduction, the punishment being eight years in the penitentiary.

The court at the request of the district attorney gave the following charge: “You are further charged in connection with the main charge as to Eula Scroggins being an accomplice, and that her testimony must be corroborated by other testimony tending to connect the defendant with the offense charged: That the corroborating evidence need not be direct and positive independent of the testimony of the said Eula Scrog-gins, but proof of such facts and circumstances as tend to support her…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Beeson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Clements v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Ballard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  2. Capshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API