Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Joseph S. Finch & Co. v. McKittrick

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided February 25, 1938No. Nos. 668-672PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTIS, District Judge.

Following the adoption of the Twenty-First Amendment to the Constitution, may Missouri prohibit the sale within the state of intoxicating liquors manufactured in such other states as have laws discriminating against intoxicating liquors manufactured in other states (including Missouri) ? More specifically, if Michigan has a law imposing a tax upon the importation of intoxicating liquors from Missouri and other states, which tax (or a tax similar in amount) Michigan manufacturers of intoxicating liquors are not reqitired to pay, may Missouri lawfully prohibit the sale in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Joseph S. Finch & Co. v. McKittrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Ajax Distributors, Inc. v. SpringerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
  3. Opinion No. 72-182 (1972) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1972
  4. Paul Gray, Inc. v. IngelsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
  5. Southwest Engineering Co. v. ErnstArizona Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API