Legal Opinion · Dissent

Paul Gray, Inc. v. Ingels

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 9, 1938No. Eq. 1203-CPublished

1DissentYankwich, District Judge

I dissent.

The California Caravan Act of 1937 (Cal.Stats.1937, Ch. 788, p. 2253) having been passed to supplant the Caravan Act of 1935, St. 1935, p. 1453, voided by the courts (Morf v. Ingels, 1936, 14 F.Supp. 922; Ingels v. Morf, 1937, 300 U.S. 290, 57 S.Ct. 439, 81 L.Ed. 653), the challenge to it must be considered in the light of the postulate that the legislative body sought by the new Act to overcome the infirmities of the old Act. United States v. Bekins, 1938, 58 S.Ct. 811, 82 L.Ed.-. Both Acts aim to control highway transportation within the state. The power of a state so to do is…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API