Spaulding v. Douglas Aircraft Co.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON, District Judge.
This is an action under the Declaratory Judgment Statute, wherein plaintiffs seek to have this court hold that the Renegotiation Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1191, in its original form to and including the amendments by the act of July 14, 1943, is unconstitutional and unenforceable. The controversy arises over the fact that the War Department has determined that the plaintiffs’ profits for the year 1942 were excessive, and in order to recapture said claimed excessive profits has directed the defendant to withhold certain payments due the plaintiffs for the benefit of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Decatur v. PauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Local 2677, American Federation of Government Employees v. PhillipsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- Campaign Clean Water, Inc. v. Russell E. Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973