Legal Opinion
Covarrubias Teposte v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 26, 2010No. 08-72516PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Petitioner’s Motion to Amend Opinion is GRANTED in part. The opinion filed on October 26, 2010 and published at 623 F.3d 1094, is amended as follows.
*1051The opinion concludes with: “We therefore grant the petition for review. PETITION GRANTED.” These two sentences shall be deleted and replaced with the following language:
“We therefore grant the petition for review and vacate the order of removal.
PETITION GRANTED, ORDER VACATED.”
Footnote 2 shall remain unchanged and shall follow the final sentence in the opinion as amended.
Petitioner’s motion for permission to file a supplemental reply to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Fernandez-Ruiz v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Jose Alfredo Pallares-GalanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Jeffrey Dean BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. FishCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Carlos Flores-Lopez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Hector Rodriguez-Castellon v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Walter Quijada-Aguilar v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Randly BegayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.