United States v. Fish
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KAYATTA, Circuit Judge.
Federal law makes it a crime to possess body armor after having been convicted of a “crime of violence” as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 16 (“section 16”). See 18 U.S.C. § 931. Appellant David Fish possessed body armor after having been convicted of several crimes, and the district court ruled that at least one of those several offenses qualified as a crime of violence under section 16. Following that ruling, Fish entered a conditional plea of guilty, reserving the right to challenge on this timely appeal the determination that he had previously been convicted of a crime of…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. WhindletonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- United States v. TavaresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- United States v. EllisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.