Legal Opinion

United States v. Fish

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 26, 2014No. 12-1791PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge.

Federal law makes it a crime to possess body armor after having been convicted of a “crime of violence” as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 16 (“section 16”). See 18 U.S.C. § 931. Appellant David Fish possessed body armor after having been convicted of several crimes, and the district court ruled that at least one of those several offenses qualified as a crime of violence under section 16. Following that ruling, Fish entered a conditional plea of guilty, reserving the right to challenge on this timely appeal the determination that he had previously been convicted of a crime of…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. WhindletonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. TavaresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. EllisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API