Legal Opinion

Cordovan Associates, Incorporated v. Dayton Rubber Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 6, 1960No. 14029_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

The Dayton Rubber Company, a manufacturer of automobile tires and tubes, brought this action for a declaratory judgment, interpreting the pricing clause of a contract between that company and Cordovan Associates, Incorporated, one of the two automotive retail chain stores to which its manufactured tires and tubes were sold. The contract prices to be paid for tires, purchased by Cordovan Associates from Dayton Rubber Company, were to be “prices prevailing on date of shipment.” A separate contract with White Stores, Inc., the other automotive retail chain store to which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chandler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  2. Harris Stanley Coal & Land Co. v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
  3. Letcher County v. De FoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  4. Federal Surety Co. v. A. Bentley & Sons Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  5. Walling v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cordovan Associates, Incorporated v. Dayton Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API