Legal Opinion

Harris Stanley Coal & Land Co. v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1946No. 9987, 9988PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

The principal question in these appeals is whether a case had been made by the railroad for the granting to it of a permanent injunction. It sought to restrain certain operations by the coal company in its mine adjacent to the railroad right-of-way, the operations being alleged to threaten injury to the property of the railroad and to constitute a hazard to the freight and passenger traffic moving over its line. A temporary injunction pending consideration of the merits, was earlier granted but later dissolved. Upon full hearing a permanent injunction was refused and a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Pennsylvania v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Larry Leon Chaney v. Margaret M. Heckler, as Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. Rogers v. Girard Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  3. Reserve Mining Co. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  4. Bach v. Friden Calculating MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
  5. Glenside West Corp. v. Exxon Co., USADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API