Blanchard v. Blanchard
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order denying a new trial. C. W. Norton, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Plaintiff was granted a divorce on the ground of cruelty. Many specific acts are alleged in support of the general conclusion that for years defendant has pursued “a-course of cruel treatment of plaintiff and has caused her grievous mental suffering.”
These allegations are denied by the answer and the testimony of the parties is sharply conflicting. As stated by him, “The main point relied upon by appellant is that there is a total want of corroboration of plaintiff’s testimony to justify the judgment and findings of the court.”
In the determination of the question the following considerations…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Andrews v. AndrewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Briggs v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Avery v. AveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Evans v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Cooper v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by8 opinions
- Donaldson v. DonaldsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Piatt v. PiattIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
- Jones v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- McGann v. McGannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Thoele v. ThoeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.