Legal Opinion
Frederick Schlottman v. Thomas Perez
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 3, 2014No. 12-5132PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
TATEL, Circuit Judge.
Because the federal government’s administrative procedures for resolving complaints of discrimination are complex and confusing, individuals sometimes file their complaints with the wrong agency. In an effort to deal with this problem, Congress adopted a savings clause: “[i]n any case in which an employee is required to file any action ... under this section and the employee timely files the action ... with an agency other than the agency with which the action ... is to be filed, the employee shall be treated as having…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re GrantCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Halo Wireless, Inc. v. Alenco Communications, Inc. (In Re Halo Wireless, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Danise J. Whittington v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Frank v. RidgeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Frank v. ChertoffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Susan Morris v. Gina McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Webster v. United States Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Rodgers v. PerezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Williams v. Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for DcDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Coleman v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.