Legal Opinion
Rodgers v. Perez
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 29, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-0208PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge
Plaintiff Sakeithea Rodgers (“Ms.Rodgers”) brings this action against the United States Department of Labor (“DOL”) alleging discrimination on the basis of sex and retaliation for prior protected civil rights activity in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 20Q0e et seq. and 42 U.S.C. § 1981a. The DOL moves to dismiss Ms. Rodgers’s complaint for failure to exhaust her administrative remedies. Upon consideration of the motion, the response and reply there to, the applicable law, the entire record, and for the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Roy E. Bowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bowe-Connor v. McDonaldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Hornsby v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Hornsby v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- West v. MayorkasDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024