Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barrientos ex rel. Nelson v. Jones

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2012No. 20100277Published

1DissentJustice Lee

1 42 I respectfully dissent from the court's decision to order a new trial in this case. First, although I agree that defense counsel asked objectionable questions at trial, I would defer to the trial court's finding that no substantial prejudice resulted from those questions and affirm its denial of the motion for new trial. Second, as to Ogden City's vehicle pursuit policy, I would find that it complies with Utah Code section 41-6a-212 and that the City accordingly qualifies for a privilege under its terms. That conclusion forecloses plaintiff's remaining arguments on appeal, and I would…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cassim v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. v. Dieterich, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  3. Child v. GondaUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Schmidt v. Intermountain Health Care, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Stolte v. FaganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API