Young v. Bailey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EDMUNDS, Justice.
Following the reelection of defendant Daniel Bailey to the office of Sheriff of Mecklenburg County, plaintiffs employment as a deputy sheriff was terminated. In response, plaintiff brought this action, alleging wrongful termination in violation of the North Carolina public policy enunciated in N.C.G.S. § 153A-99, and of Article I, Sections 14 and 36 of the North Carolina Constitution. We hold that plaintiff was not a county employee as defined in N.C.G.S. § 153A-99. As a result, she is not entitled to the protections provided in that statute and was not terminated in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Branti v. FinkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- O'Hare Truck Service, Inc. v. City of NorthlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Jenkins v. MedfordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Coman v. Thomas Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Randleman v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Akers v. County of SampsonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2022
- Benson v. Pender County Sheriffs OfficeDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
- Brearley v. FDH Infrastructure Services LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2023
- Brown v. GreeneDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2024
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.