Legal Opinion

Young v. Bailey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 29, 2016No. 355PA14-2PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMUNDS, Justice.

Following the reelection of defendant Daniel Bailey to the office of Sheriff of Mecklenburg County, plaintiffs employment as a deputy sheriff was terminated. In response, plaintiff brought this action, alleging wrongful termination in violation of the North Carolina public policy enunciated in N.C.G.S. § 153A-99, and of Article I, Sections 14 and 36 of the North Carolina Constitution. We hold that plaintiff was not a county employee as defined in N.C.G.S. § 153A-99. As a result, she is not entitled to the protections provided in that statute and was not terminated in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Branti v. FinkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. O'Hare Truck Service, Inc. v. City of NorthlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Jenkins v. MedfordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  5. Coman v. Thomas Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Randleman v. JohnsonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016
  2. Akers v. County of SampsonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2022
  3. Benson v. Pender County Sheriffs OfficeDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2021
  4. Brearley v. FDH Infrastructure Services LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2023
  5. Brown v. GreeneDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2024

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API