Legal Opinion

Petrie v. General Contracting Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1966No. 10422PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiff, Malcolm Petrie, sued to quiet title to mining claims in Wasatch County in which the defendant, Reed Tuft, claims a one-third interest. Upon trial to the court, after the plaintiff had rested his case, defendant made a motion for judgment which was granted; and in accordance with the provisions of Rule 41 (b) U.R.C.P. made findings and entered judgment thereon. Accordingly, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to them.1 Plaintiff appeals.

In the latter part of 1962 plaintiff had hired Mr. Tuft as his attorney to sue General Contracting Company and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Webster v. SweatCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  2. Lawrence v. Bamberger Railroad CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Young v. LevineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  4. Rupp v. CoolSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Citibank Federal Savings Bank v. New Plan Realty TrustCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Jackson v. HallsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  3. Sohm v. WinegarUtah Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API