Schanz v. City of Billings
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy
Plaintiffs Arthur and Rachel Schanz appeal from the judgment of the District Court, Yellowstone County, which dismissed their claim that annexation by the defendants City of Billings, et ah, of certain property known as the Hayes Subdivision was ineffective, dismissed their claim that the Hayes Subdivision should not have been zoned R-7200 when it was annexed, and ordered that plaintiffs’ application for a zone change be heard and reconsidered in accordance with criteria set forth in this Court’s decision in Lowe v. City of Missoula (1974), 165 Mont. 38, 525 P.2d 551.
Arthur Schanz has been in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. West v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Low v. Town of MadisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Freeman v. Board of AdjustmentMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- Bishop v. Town of HoughtonWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Sundance Hills Homeowners Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- North 93 Neighbors, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Snyder v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Gregg v. Whitefish City CouncilMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Quinlan v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Blanchard v. Show Low Planning & Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.