Legal Opinion

Looram v. Looram

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1936PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoughran, J.

On December 31, 1928, Matthew M. Looram by a written instrument conveyed to himself as trustee personal property described in a schedule thereto annexed. He was then a widower having three children therein named as primary beneficiaries. Thereafter Mr. Looram married the plaintiff who, on his death, brought tins action against the respective parties in interest under the trust indenture. Judgment is demanded declaring the instrument void as suspending the absolute ownership of personal property for a longer period than during the continuance and until the termination of two lives in being at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Proving the Will of MountNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. In Re the Will of HornerNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Vanderpoel v. . LoewNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Lougheed v. Dykeman's Baptist ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BerwindNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
  2. In Re the Accounting of Fifth Avenue Bank of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. In re the Estate of CarrNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  4. In re the Express Trust Made by LachlanNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. In re the Intermediate Account of RichmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API