Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Maloney v. Wells

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1961No. File 9959PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANSON, Circuit Judge.

*391Nominally entitled in quo warranto, the subsequent pleadings and issues on both sides make it abundantly clear that this original proceeding is in the nature of mandamus. The legislature has conferred upon this court jurisdiction of such proceeding to determine right to an office. SDC 1960 Supp. 37.4501. The jurisdiction of this court in a proceeding in the nature of mandamus is not limited or restricted by the name given in the pleadings to the proceedings.

On June 15, 1960, the respondent, Goldie Wells, was duly and legally appointed to the office of Employment Security…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McArthur v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. State v. BeckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Gillum v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Tatum v. WheelessMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Wheelon v. South Dakota Land Settlement BoardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Board of Regents v. CarterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Apa v. ButlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Terry v. WilderRichmond County Circuit Court · 1992
  4. Apa v. ButlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Board of Regents v. CarterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API