Legal Opinion
Goncalves v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 15, 1985No. Civ. A. 83-999PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Anthony and Clara Goncalves seek compensatory and punitive damages for injuries allegedly caused by asbestos products which defendant Eagle-Picher Industries manufactured. According to the Amended Complaint, Anthony Goncalves worked as a pipefitter and chemical operator for GAF Corporation in Linden, New Jersey, from 1963 to 1971; Mr. Goncalves also worked as a pipefitter and insulator for the American Cyanimid Corporation in Linden from 1972 to 1981. Amended Complaint U 8. Plaintiffs allege that, during this eighteen-year period, Mr.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & BonelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- John Novosel v. Nationwide Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Berg v. Reaction Motors DivisionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Richetta v. Stanley Fastening Systems, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009