In re the Probate of the Will of Reynolds
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified in accordance with the memorandum and as modified affirmed, with costs to appellants-eontestants payable out of the estate. Memorandum: Based upon the liberalization of pretrial practice permitting examinations before trial without restriction with respect to burden of proof (see Marie Dorros, Inc. v. Dorros Bros., 274 App. Div. 11; CPLR 3101, subd. [a]), the Surrogate ordered the contestants to comply with paragraph Third (d) of proponents’ demand for bill of particulars, requiring contestants to state the facts which they “intend to offer as proof on the trial to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marie Dorros, Inc. v. Dorros Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- In re the Estate of MullinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In Re the Probate of the Will of MullinNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- In re the Probate of the Will of WeisbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Rakov v. GingoldNew York Supreme Court · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hyman & Gilbert v. GreensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re the Estate of BerylAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re the Estate of Du BrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Grossman v. Osteopathic Hospital & Clinic of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- In re the Estate of Be GarNew York Surrogate's Court · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.