Rakov v. Gingold
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrank Del Vecchio, J.
This is a motion for an order to vacate a demand for a bill of particulars made by respondent in a special proceeding to correct the assessment on petitioner’s real property. The motion is on two grounds: (1) that the demand is not authorized or permitted by law, and (2) that, if authorized, the demand is unnecessarily burdensome. In the alternative petitioner seeks to modify the demand by striking therefrom requests for matters claimed to be of an evidentiary character.
As to the first ground, it is the contention of petitioner, with which respondent does not agree, that bills of particulars…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Matter of Board of Water Supply of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Heiman v. BishopNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Dwight v. . Germania Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
- People Ex Rel. Manhattan Railway Co. v. BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- In re the Estate of MullinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ginsberg v. GinsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re the Probate of the Will of ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Limerick v. FitzgeraldNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Onondaga County Water District v. Board of AssessorsNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Allen v. Board of AssessorsNew York Supreme Court · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.