Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Pittman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 14, 1984No. 83-149PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Justice.

Petitioner David A. Pittman contends the trial court erred in four respects in a decree dissolving his marriage to respondent Christine M. Pittman. He asserts the court erred in giving Christine sole custody of their two children, in fixing the amount of child support, in dividing the property, and in awarding Christine attorney fees. We affirm.

The parties were married in 1975. They have two children. Ryan was born in 1978 and Mathew in 1979. David is. a district manager for a restaurant chain and earns about $2,000 net pay per month. Christine works for a finance company…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. First National Bank of Mason CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. In Re the Marriage of BeehSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Wolfswinkel v. GesinkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  4. In Re the Marriage of WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of RannigerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1988
  2. Hunt v. KinneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  3. In RE the Marriage of Rachel A. McDermott and Stephen J. McDermott Upon the Petition of Rachel A. McDermottSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. In RE the Marriage of Rachel A. McDermott and Stephen J. McDermott Upon the Petition of Rachel A. McDermottSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  5. In Re Marriage of RannigerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API