Legal Opinion · Dissent

In RE the Marriage of Rachel A. McDermott and Stephen J. McDermott Upon the Petition of Rachel A. McDermott

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 1, 2013No. 11–0445Published

1DissentAppel, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The result embraced by the majority forces Stephen to face Hobson’s choices that will produce an inequitable result in this case.

The end result of the majority in this case is that Rachel, who entered the twelve-year marriage with assets of $34,808, will leave the marriage with a significant increase in her earning capacity because of education and training she obtained during the course of the marriage and an unencumbered award of $1,087,716. Stephen, on the other hand, will be left with a substantially impaired earning ability and assets carrying a substantial tax…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of SteenhoekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. In Re the Marriage of BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  3. In Re the Marriage of MuelhauptSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  4. In Re Marriage of CalleniusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. In Re the Marriage of HoakSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API