Legal Opinion

United States v. Ava Pittman and Paula Wynn, Also Known as Paula M. Lynn

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 7, 1971No. 71-1367_1PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

Convicted of violating 26 U.S.C. § 4705(a) (sale of narcotics without an order form) and 18 U.S.C. § 371 (conspiracy), Pittman and Wynn appeal. We reverse and remand for a new trial because the privacy of the jury room was improperly invaded by an agent of the prosecution.

After the jury in this case had retired to deliberate, it notified the trial judge that it wished to listen again to a tape recording that had been played during the course of the trial. Since the tape could be erased by inept use of the recorder, the court, seeking to prevent a loss of evidence, directed the Government…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Turner v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. United States v. Angel Prieto-OlivasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Sandiford JosephCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Beaumont Gereau, in Nos. 74-2019, 74-2020, 74-2021, 74-2022,74-2023Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. HowardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Mary Josephine VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Lawrence W. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. Daphne W. EssexCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API