Legal Opinion

Mundy v. Gentilly Oaks, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 14, 1955No. 41394, 41909PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Justice.

In this cause the plaintiff, James W. Mundy, is prosecuting two separate, though consolidated appeals, taken from judgments sustaining exceptions of no cause of action and dismissing the suit as to some of the cited defendants.

The allegations of plaintiff’s petition, together with certain documents on which they are largely predicated, disclose generally the following factual situation. Desiring to develop a real estate subdivision upon land situated in New Orleans which it owned, including the construction of some 283 houses, Gentilly Oaks, Inc. first made arrangements with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vicknair v. Daily States Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  2. Wisemore v. First Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  3. Fellman v. DreyfousSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
  4. New Iberia Extract of Tabasco Pepper Co. v. E. McIlhenny's SonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kenneth Wayne Dupuy v. Robert H. Butler, Sr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  2. Fontenot v. FontenotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  3. Mundy v. Gentilly Oaks, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  4. Acorn v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Lazar v. GremillionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API